Warning: include(/www/s/u/u23979/public_html/images/obrazky/header.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /www/s/u/u23979/public_html/libraries/import.php on line 2

Warning: include(/www/s/u/u23979/public_html/images/obrazky/header.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /www/s/u/u23979/public_html/libraries/import.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/www/s/u/u23979/public_html/images/obrazky/header.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php53/share/pear') in /www/s/u/u23979/public_html/libraries/import.php on line 2
Open Letter to the President of the Association of Slovak Judges

Open Letter to the President of the Association of Slovak Judges

Dear Mrs. President,

In connection with the nomination of the candidates to the position of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic you today on 28 April 2014 inter alia stated for the TA3 television programme that the Association of Slovak Judges supports the candidacy of Stefan Harabin who although has not 100% support  of the judges, but still he is supported by a significant majority of the judges. Your full statement can be heard in:

http://www.ta3.com/clanok/1039302/borec-na-post-sefa-najvyssieho-sudu-nominoval-janu-bajankovu.html

We oppose this statement. You as the President of the Association of Slovak Judges have the mandate to speak only for the members of your Association and not for all judges, that means also not even for us, moreover in such a significant question. We presented very real arguments for which we state that Stefan Harabin does not fulfill minimum moral criteria for performance of the supreme judicial position.

We ask you what factually qualifies you to such statements which we perceive as misleading the public.

According to our information even the common members of the Association of Slovak Judges have not approved by majority of votes the Association of Slovak Judges to nominate Stefan Harabin to this position. The public does not differentiate between promoting and supporting a candidate, and the public sees your statement as the wish of the judges organised in the Association of Slovak Judges  to elect Stefan Harabin again. However, this is the internal case of the members of your professional organisation.

More, you provide incorrect information about number of your members. For instance only in Bratislava section of the Association of Slovak Judges you register  as your members those judges who for a longer time resigned their membership for the Association of Slovak Judges, who left for pension, you even register a deceased judge. It would be correct to respect the notices of the judges, to whom you keep sending mail as to the Association of Slovak Judges members, about such failures and to state real number of your members.

Many judges who are today the members of the association “For Open Judiciary“ long ago belonged to the long-time  and very active members  of the Association of Slovak Judges. They invested many efforts and much time at the expense of their privacy, to build the Association of Slovak Judges as a strong professional organisation and a representative of significant majority of Slovak judges. After 2006, when the presidency period of Juraj Majchrak the President of the Association of Slovak Judges  finished, the Association of Slovak Judges started a completely different way and also your statement of today is a devaluation of the values for which we pushed for together. Therefore we feel a moral obligation to publicly distinguish from this also in this form.

Done at Bratislava 28 April 2014

JUDr. Katarina Javorcikova

President of ZOJ

Leave your comments

0
terms and condition.

Comments (3)

  • Guest (Jade Towers)

    There are soo many interesting things to understand and these can be informative as well for readers of perfect essay writers. Therefore, we should enhance our knowledge by paying attention towards such kind of articles. But this monogram is looking very difficult to understand.

  • Guest (hopewill)

    There is an absurd best of Hermes replica handbags attainable to buy online or offline. Sometimes it is appealing difficult to analyze amid aboriginal and replica. Of advance the a lot of acclaimed designers are the a lot of accepted and it is accepted to see handbags by designers such as Fendi and Gucci for arrangement either online or offline.While it may not assume like you would acquisition a replica backpack of abundant above at a resale shop, it does happen. Handbags are accustomed abroad all the time by those who move on to added styles and fashions, and abounding of the handbags end up in claimed sales or at resale shops. Browse through bounded Replica Handbags sales generally to be at allowance of award a acceptable deal.Friends can be the atomic big-ticket antecedent of award replica handbags. If you accept a associate or two that has accomplished tastes in handbags, attending through their accumulating and agenda how abounding handbags they have. Ask if they use them regularly, and if they don't, see if you can buy it for an agreed aloft sum. The account actuality is that Prada Replica you are already accompany with the individual, and thus, you can get a affable abatement or, if you are lucky, get the replica backpack for no amount at all.

  • Guest (Jack kevin)

    In educating folks about correspondence choices for their hard of need someone to do my assignment hearing youngsters, present and developing confirmation ought to be considered.

    from United Kingdom
You are here: Home Documents Zoj Open Letter to the President of the Association of Slovak Judges

Contact

Civil association
P.O.BOX 112, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Our partners